[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name
|
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:46:27 +0100 |
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Christian Robert
<address@hidden> wrote:
> )edit function_name
One can define ]edit command with ]usercmd and I think usable
implementation of it can be written in just few lines of APL
without any changes to the interpreter itself.
-k
- [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/03/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/22
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/22
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/24