Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product

[Jay Foad]

On 7 July 2016 at 11:39, Kacper Gutowski <address@hidden> wrote:

On 7 July 2016 at 11:07, Jay Foad wrote:
> (I think you meant ⊂f/A g B on the RHS?)

No, I don't think I did.  That enclosure is already a result of reduction.

I was thinking of cases like this (in GNU APL):

      (+/3 4 ⍴ 5 6)≡3 4 +.⍴ 5 6

0

      (⊂+/3 4 ⍴ 5 6)≡3 4 +.⍴ 5 6

1

Jay.