Re: [Bug-apl] compiling

[Juergen Sauermann]

Hi,

no specific order needed.

Unfortunately the object files (actually their names) for the same 
source file are different in the apl build and in the libapl build.
Also the Makefiles and everything in .deps/

Therefore you always need a ./configure or ./configure --with-libapl 
before each of the builds.

And a make clean or even make distclean before each ./configure is 
always a good idea.

The complaints in make distclean are because distclean does not know 
what was built beforehand, so it wants
to remove files that may belong to the other build.

The cleanest solution to all of this is to check out GNU APL into 
different directories - one for apl and one for libapl.

/// Jürgen




On 01/29/2017 05:35 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> is there a preferred order to compiling the apl binary and libapl
>
> does doing one before the other deprive something of something? :)   all file 
> sizes seem the exact same   except of course libapl.h/.la/.so   and   bin/apl   
>  depending on whether --with-libapl is used
>
> i am doing the libapl first then the apl binary
>
> ---
>
> make distclean  gives a lot of
>
> rm -f Makefile
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src/testcases'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src'
> Makefile:901: .deps/apl-Archive.Po: No such file or directory
> Makefile:902: .deps/apl-ArrayIterator.Po: No such file or directory
> Makefile:903: .deps/apl-Assert.Po: No such file or directory
> Makefile:904: .deps/apl-Avec.Po: No such file or directory
> Makefile:905: .deps/apl-Backtrace.Po: No such file or directory
> Makefile:906: .deps/apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.Po: No such file or directory
> ....
>
> i guess using   make clean   is the preferred way?