Re: APL2 Compatibility

[Jay Foad]

> My
>
> 1 / / 1 1 ⍴ 1
>
> example was only meant to demonstrate that in APL2 an operator can have
> another operator (in this case itself) as left argument. And in that case 
> binding
> the leftmost 1 to the left / operator would be, at least IMHO and referring 
> only
> to the language reference manual, as valid as binding the left / operator to 
> the
> right / operator.

I don't think so. See the discussion of "Name and Symbol Binding"
starting on p33, and in particular on p35:

"There is no binding between operators. In the expression ,¨/ catenate binds as
left operand to the each operator, and then the derived function ,¨
binds as left
operand to the slash operator."

Jay.