bug-auctex
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 4.33; reftex-toc does not work, for certain values of k


From: Uwe Brauer
Subject: [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 4.33; reftex-toc does not work, for certain values of kill-buffer-hook
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:57:34 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

Ralf Angeli wrote:
* Uwe Brauer (2010-06-20) writes:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:03:29 +0200, Ralf Angeli<address@hidden>  wrote:

    >  * Uwe Brauer (2010-06-16) writes:

    >  In my case `ensure-in-vc-or-check-in-modes' is not defined when starting
    >  XEmacs 21.4.22 with
    >  $ xemacs -q -no-site-file

Well the reason is: this function is not part of standard
Xemacs.

I just attach the whole lisp file.

Evaluating the file contents, loading circ.tex and typing `C-c =' brings
up the table of contents without problems, using XEmacs 21.4.22 with the
packaged RefTeX 4.21.  Does this only happen with 4.33?  (I'm not sure
how you installed that, because the installation procedure does not
support XEmacs.)

So you loaded the file I attached and put the function in
the kill-buffer-hook?
I did not check 4.21, since I have upgraded to 4.33 several
months ago (4.21 has some annoying bugs).

What do you mean is not officially supported?
One thing is that we can't have it in the package system and
neither auctex 11.85, because of GPL3 (not all files in
Xemacs are under GPL2+) :'(.

INSTALLATION:
I changed in the make file
EMACS=/usr/bin/xemacs21-mule
run make
did not run make install
but just added the path with the compiled lisp files in my
init files.
(push (expand-file-name "~/xemacs/site-lisp/packages/reftex-4.33/lisp/") load-path)

That works with one sort of bug, when I first open a file
with the extension .tex the file is *not* in latex mode but
in fundamental mode I have to close it and to reopen it then
everything is fine and any other file I open is fine as
well, so I guess some autoloading does not work.

Uwe Brauer



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]