Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] preview-1.287; Installation warns about impossibilities

[Tassilo Horn]

Reinhard Kotucha <address@hidden> writes:

>  > >>   mgs -q -dNODISPLAY -c "2 3 mul" -c quit
>  > >
>  > > Ok, now I'm using the latter.
>  > 
>  > That leaves a non-empty stack, so I'd rather use "2 3 mul pop".  Any
>  > reason why that's necessary at all?  Why would not just -c quit be
>  > sufficient?  After all, quit is interpreted by the PostScript
>  > interpreter just the same as 2 3 mul would be?
>
> Hi David,
> yes, -c quit is definitely the smallest valid PostScript program I can
> think of.

So fine, now we're using that.

Bye,
Tassilo