[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61 |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:30:24 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Wildenhues on 6/16/2008 11:46 AM:
| Hello, and sorry for the delay,
Hello Ralf, and better late than never ;)
|
| I'm punting. The '#define header templates' test already requires that
| #undef macro additional-stuff
|
| removes "additional-stuff" from the input. It may be possible to
| distinguish between '/* comments */', '// C++ comments', and other
| junk, but I don't think it's worth the effort, nor worth slowing
| everyone else down.
Fair enough.
|
| I vote for keeping the current behavior. Changing it introduces an
| arbitrary backwards incompatibility; yet there hasn't even been a bug
| report which would benefit by this. (OTOH, there have been real,
| actual, problematic bug reports which have so far generated much fewer
| traffic...)
|
| OK to commit this conservative fix?
Yes; please go ahead.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhXIcAACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCJCQCeLOPTNiFvsQGh7HNM85gepykI
/lMAnj3N3LJ7aeWrOzXm2JzTmhizjW+E
=6MWV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Karsten Hopp, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/04
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Eric Blake, 2008/06/17
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Stepan Kasal, 2008/06/18
- Re: regression in autoconf-2.62 vs. 2.61, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/06/19