|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: echo vs. printf regression (darwin8) |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:13:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
On 08/16/2010 12:11 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 08/15/10 21:26, David Fang wrote:I'm desperate enough to use sed to patch config.status after it's been generated:If you're that desperate, you're desperate enough to use bash instead of the broken Darwin shell, no? To others: Would it be appropriate to patch Autoconf to generate a 'configure' that rejects that implementation of 'echo', if it discovers the bug?
Yes. Or that rejects that shell. I'd be wary of using a value of $as_echo that goes against POSIX.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |