[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13524: [PATCH 0/2] Improving user experience for non-recursive build
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
bug#13524: [PATCH 0/2] Improving user experience for non-recursive builds |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:26:39 +0100 |
On 02/08/2013 01:31 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 10:11 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2013-02-08 09:45, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>>> Fine as well. And of curse, if you want to speed thing up and have more
>>>> control on the final result, feel free to shepherd the pending patches to
>>>> the agreed form ;-) -- which if I'm not mistaken is:
>>>>
>>>> - make the series consist of only two patches, one introducing the
>>>> feature (complete with documentation and NEWS additions, plus your
>>>> original test case), and one follow-up patch implementing my
>>>> testsuite enhancement;
>>>>
>>>> - use the '%...%' form, and prefer lower-case for long names (so,
>>>> '%reldir%' a.k.a. '%D%' and '%canon-reldir%' a.k.a. '%C%').
>>>
>>> Done. I didn't address the canonicalization concern raised by Miles. That
>>> seems like a bigger issue than this patch series. However, If that naming
>>> is changing, it must be done before this series lands in a released
>>> version, or we'll end up with bad comptibility hacks...
>>
>> Errm, compatibility...
>>
>> Forgot to ask, but should I push out this non-fast-forward to the
>> experimental/preproc branch?
>>
> Yes please. I will rewind it again once I have, as you suggest, fixed
> my "demo test" not to needlessly fiddle with '/dev/full'.
>
OK, done. If there are no further objections, I will soon proceed to
re-write the experimental/preproc branch once again with the latest
version of these patches; then we can think when and how to merge it
into 'master' or 'next' (the merge will be delayed until the discussion
about the new branching/versioning scheme for automake has been sorted
out; see <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13578>).
Thanks,
Stefano
-*-*-*-
Peter Rosin (1):
preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments
Stefano Lattarini (1):
preproc: enhance and extend tests
NEWS | 12 +++
automake.in | 26 ++++--
doc/automake.texi | 20 +++++
t/list-of-tests.mk | 4 +
t/preproc-basics.sh | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++
t/preproc-c-compile.sh | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/preproc-demo.sh | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/preproc-errmsg.sh | 75 ++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 585 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/preproc-basics.sh
create mode 100755 t/preproc-c-compile.sh
create mode 100755 t/preproc-demo.sh
create mode 100755 t/preproc-errmsg.sh
--
1.8.1.1.662.gaa39828
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, (continued)
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- bug#13524: [PATCH 2/2] preproc: enhance and extend tests, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/08
- bug#13524: [PATCH 0/2] Improving user experience for non-recursive builds,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bert Wesarg, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 2/2] preproc: enhance and extend tests, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- bug#13524: [PATCH 0/2] Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/23
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Peter Johansson, 2013/02/04