[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: process substitution flawed by design
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: process substitution flawed by design |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:19:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:11:22PM +0100, Florian Mayer wrote:
> >What does it do?
> It behaves like the p-operation on unary Sys-V semaphores.
OK, without digging any further into this morass, and without trying
to guess whether you've found a bug in bash or in your own tool, can I
just leave this here on the nightstand?
http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/045
I can't even try to guess what problem you are actually attempting to
solve here, but it looks like you're making things about 5 times as
complicated as they should be. If the problem is *inherently* this
complex, then you shouldn't be solving it with a bash (or zsh) script.