[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so
From: |
markus at trippelsdorf dot de |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:48:29 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
(In reply to address@hidden from comment #7)
> Hello,
>
> I think the patch is not correct.
>
> Unless --target is specified, it creates archives using the "plugin" target,
> which may not be compatible with the target. For example, the archive
> format on IBM AIX is not compatible with the "plugin" one.
>
> I think the ar.c:open_inarch lines:
> if (target == NULL)
> target = plugin_target;
> should be moved (target shouldn't be overridden when creating a new target).
I think you re-opened the wrong bug.
The lines you're talking about were introduced in 2010 by Alan:
commit 90b79792c01821d14248f4cf8c330a599fb5a4b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically,
markus at trippelsdorf dot de <=
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2014/09/22