bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/19587] New: Some of the less-well used targets won't compi


From: dhowells at redhat dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/19587] New: Some of the less-well used targets won't compile with gcc-6 due to static vars in opcode headers
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:43:11 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19587

            Bug ID: 19587
           Summary: Some of the less-well used targets won't compile with
                    gcc-6 due to static vars in opcode headers
           Product: binutils
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: binutils
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: dhowells at redhat dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

gcc-6 added a new warning -Wunused-const-variable that causes unused constant
variables to generate a warning.  Binutils adds -Werror to the build which
turns this into an error.

The opcode header files define a bunch of static constant variables, mostly
arrays, that now fall foul of this.  Errors like the following are generated:

 ../../binutils-2.26/opcodes/../include/opcode/metag.h:686:30: error:
'metag_scondtab' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable]

This error can be suppressed by adding -Wno-unused-const-variable to the build.
Note that whilst -Wno-error=unused-const-variable could be used with gcc-6, it
cannot be used with anything older.


The following are all potential problems:

warthog>git grep "static const.*=" master -- include/opcode/*.h | sed
s/master://
include/opcode/dlx.h:static const struct dlx_opcode dlx_opcodes[] =
include/opcode/hppa.h:static const char *const completer_chars =
",CcY<>address@hidden&U~FfGHINnOoZMadu|/=0123%e$m}";
include/opcode/hppa.h:static const struct pa_opcode pa_opcodes[] =
include/opcode/i860.h:static const struct i860_opcode i860_opcodes[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const metag_reg metag_regtab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const metag_reg metag_dsp_regtab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const metag_reg metag_dsp_tmpl_regtab[2][56] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const metag_acf metag_acftab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const split_condition metag_scondtab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const split_condition metag_dsp_scondtab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const split_condition metag_fpu_scondtab[] =
include/opcode/metag.h:static const insn_template metag_optab[] =
include/opcode/mips.h:static const unsigned int mips_isa_table[] = {
include/opcode/nds32.h:static const int nds32_r45map[] =
include/opcode/nds32.h:static const int nds32_r54map[] =
include/opcode/ns32k.h:static const struct ns32k_opcode ns32k_opcodes[]=
include/opcode/score-datadep.h:static const struct insn_to_dependency
insn_to_dependency_table[] =
include/opcode/score-datadep.h:static const struct data_dependency
data_dependency_table[] =
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const reg tic30_regtab[] = {
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const ind_addr_type tic30_indaddr_tab[] = {
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const insn_template tic30_optab[] = {
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const insn_template *const tic30_optab_end =
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const partemplate tic30_paroptab[] = {
include/opcode/tic30.h:static const partemplate *const tic30_paroptab_end =
include/opcode/tic4x.h:static const tic4x_register_t tic3x_registers[] =
include/opcode/tic4x.h:static const tic4x_register_t tic4x_registers[] =
include/opcode/tic4x.h:static const tic4x_cond_t tic4x_conds[] =
include/opcode/tic4x.h:static const tic4x_indirect_t tic4x_indirects[] =
include/opcode/tic4x.h:static const tic4x_inst_t tic4x_insts[] =
include/opcode/visium.h:static const struct reg_entry gen_reg_table[] =
include/opcode/visium.h:static const struct reg_entry fp_reg_table[] =

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]