bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: addr2line seems to be off by one


From: Albert Netymk
Subject: Re: addr2line seems to be off by one
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:17:55 +0200

Yes, you are right. Reported to clang:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28596

Thank you very much.

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Alan Modra <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:06:10PM +0200, Albert Netymk wrote:
>> == addr.c
>>
>> ```
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> void f() { }
>>
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>>   f();
>>   puts("done");
>>   return 0;
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> ```
>> $ clang -g addr.c ; objdump -d a.out | grep -B 3 puts | tail -n 4
>>   400556:       e8 d5 ff ff ff          callq  400530 <f>
>>   40055b:       48 bf 04 06 40 00 00    movabs $0x400604,%rdi
>>   400562:       00 00 00
>>   400565:       e8 a6 fe ff ff          callq  400410 <address@hidden>
>> ```
>> `40055b` is corresponding to placing "done" in `%rdi`, so I expect it
>> to be associated to line of `puts("done")`. However, `addr2line
>> 40055b` shows the line of `f()`.
>>
>>
>> == ENV
>>
>> clang: clang version 3.8.1-svn271230-1~exp1 (branches/release_38)
>> addr2line: GNU addr2line (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.24
>
> Please dump out the raw line number information produced by clang,
> using "readelf -wl a.out".  I think you will find that the problem is
> with clang, not addr2line.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM



-- 
Best Regards

Yours faithfully
Albert Netymk



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]