[Bug gas/22553] .largecomm, .lbss, .ldata, and .lrodata are still not documented after many, many years

[nickc at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553

Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2018-01-04
                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi John,

  I have posted a potential patch here:

https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-01/msg00027.html

  This only addresses the .largecomm pseudo-op however.  I am not sure that 
  .ldata, .lbss, .lrodata are actual assembler pseudo-ops.  They are section 
  names, so they can appear in assembler output from the compiler as part of
  a ".section ..." directive.  But they should not appear on their own as
  directives.  Can you provide an example of how gcc generates them ?

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.