[Bug ld/22840] Several TLS tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22840

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>   Unfortunately, unlike the #ld: lines in the *.?d files which can be
>   modified by setting options_regsub(ld) for perform the appropriate 
>   substitution, this is not currently possible for the arg to 
>   run_ld_link_tests.

Can't we use a variable EMULATION or some such?

> * To make some progress, I've hardcoded the Solaris values for now, which
> leads me to the next issues:
> 
>   The file format lines in the *.?d files under test all hardcode elf32-sparc
>   or elf64-sparc, but should allow for elf32-sparc-sol2 (resp.
> elf32-sparc.*).
>
> * Even with that fixed, there are many failures due to the fact that the
> Solaris
>   ABI requires a couple of additional symbols (cf. emultempl/solaris2.em
>   (elf_solaris2_before_allocation), and those aren't currently expected in
>   the output.  I'm uncertain how best to handle that: allow for a
> postprocessing
>   step after readelf that removes those from the output or augment the
> expected
>   output accordingly?  It seems regexp_diff currently has no support for
>   optional or target-specific lines in the expected output.

Can't we have specific *.?d files for Solaris?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.