[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4
From: |
nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4 |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2018 03:14:23 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23997
--- Comment #6 from Ruslan Nikolaev <nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com> ---
BTW, I did some further testing with i386. It seems for i386, things are also
not consistent but the other way around.
.long address@hidden does not seem generate correct offset (even for PIC), but
address@hidden - . seems to always generate correct offset (even for PIC).
For both i386 and x86-64, clang/LLVM generated correct offset in either case.
So, I think, it may present some problem as i386 and x86_64 assembly code is
often (at least partially) shared.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/23997] New: PLT32 relocation is off by 4, nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com, 2018/12/16
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, fweimer at redhat dot com, 2018/12/17
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/12/17
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com, 2018/12/18
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/12/18
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com, 2018/12/18
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com, 2018/12/18
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4,
nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com <=
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2018/12/19
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/12/19
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com, 2018/12/19
- [Bug gas/23997] PLT32 relocation is off by 4, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2018/12/19