bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gas/30788] New: gas aarch64: GOT relocations referencing a local sy


From: i at maskray dot me
Subject: [Bug gas/30788] New: gas aarch64: GOT relocations referencing a local symbol should not be changed to reference STT_SECTION
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 03:33:47 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30788

            Bug ID: 30788
           Summary: gas aarch64: GOT relocations referencing a local
                    symbol should not be changed to reference STT_SECTION
           Product: binutils
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gas
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: i at maskray dot me
  Target Milestone: ---

Extracted from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63418

```
cat > a.s <<EOF
ldr     x1, [x1, :got_lo12:x]  // converted to .data+0
ldr     x1, [x1, :got_lo12:y]  // converted to .data+4

.data
// .globl x, y  would suppress STT_SECTION conversion
x:
.zero 4
y:
.long 42
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -c a.s
```

The two R_AARCH64_LD64_GOT_LO12_NC relocations are converted to reference the
STT_SECTION symbol .data .
After linking, they will share the same GOT entry (GNU ld and ld.lld use just
the symbol to decide an entry, not symbol plus addend), which is not expected.

I think this is a neglection for AArch64. For most targets (including AArch32,
x86, PowerPC, and RISC-V) local symbol to STT_SECTION conversion is suppressed
for GOT-generating relocations.

https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/issues/217 is created to decide how we
should create GOT entries, GDAT(S+A) vs GDAT(S).
If the decision is to respect existing linker behaviors and allow the same GOT
entry for :got_lo12:(.data+0) and :got_lo12:(.data+4),
this assembler change is IMO a prerequisite.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]