[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bison FAQ C++ entry is obsolete?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Bison FAQ C++ entry is obsolete? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:25:08 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
twlevo <address@hidden> writes:
> yyrhs and yys shadows a parameter gcc warning there.
> ./configure --enable-gcc-warnings
> make
> make maintainer-check
Thanks. This should be fixed in the current CVS.
> few protofiles need update,
Sorry, what's a "protofile"?
> Q5 in the FAQ about c++ is possibly quite outdated now.
Yes, quite possibly it is. Thanks. I'll CC: this to bug-bison,
where the C++ experts can tell me what's wrong with Q5.
For the record, here's Q5's current contents. How can it be improved?
Q5. Will Bison ever have C++ support?
A5. Yes, it's in the works. Things are very chaotic right now, but
what little information floats around is posted to the bug-bison
mailing list. If you're interested in testing C++ support when
it becomes available, please consider subscribing to the list,
especially if you are willing to beta test other releases as
well.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Bison FAQ C++ entry is obsolete?,
Paul Eggert <=