[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is AutoDefine/SingleCopy broken?
From: |
Mark Burgess |
Subject: |
Is AutoDefine/SingleCopy broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:56:52 +0200 |
I cannot confirm this. This is a contributed functionality and it would
take me some time to test it. I am willing to do this, but not before
October. The best bet is to send this message to the help/bug list and
hopefully the implementors will repspond.
Mark
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:49 +0300, Riku Anttila wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have used Cfengine for three years here at our department at Tampere
> University of Technology, for managing our servers and workstations in
> our mixed environment of Solaris, Gentoo and Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
> I'm writing my MSc thesis on a related topic, and Cfengine will be
> mentioned in it. Overall, Cfengine has been a great tool for us.
>
> However it seems to me that the two functions that could significantly
> simplify our configuration - AutoDefine and SingleCopy as described in
> reference manual sections 4.9.55 and 4.9.6 - simply do not work.
>
> In fact, I remember trying them out when they were first introduced - in
> version 2.0.5 according to ChangeLog - and that I had some amount of
> success. But it seems to have been broken in all the subsequent versions
> that I have ran ever since. I have posted about this in a newsgroup at
> least once, but got no reply in the group. Months later I did receive an
> e-mail asking if I ever found a solution and confirming I'm not alone in
> having this problem.
>
> Could you confirm that this functionality is indeed broken?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Is AutoDefine/SingleCopy broken?,
Mark Burgess <=