bug-commoncpp
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1.90 demos


From: David Sugar
Subject: Re: 1.90 demos
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 22:23:08 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010802

That explains a lot, because they always seemed okay here :). The question then to look at is why they were not getting regenerated properly.....

David

Michael Roberts wrote:

The makefiles were not getting regenerated by configure. Deleting
demo/Makefile and reconfiguring solves the problem and the demos build fine.
Duh !

regards

~m

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Behalf Of David Sugar
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 6:04 AM
To: Michael Roberts
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: 1.90 demos



The demos distributed with 1.9.0 should have a Makefile.in that is
correct, and which refereces ../src and libccext.la for certain things.
The Makefile.am appears correct for this to happen...

David

On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Michael Roberts wrote:

I spend a couple of minutes today trying to get the demos

compiling under

the 1.90 release.

Between 1.6.0 and 1.9.0, it looks like a few things were moved from
CommonC++-X.X.X/posix to /src and possibly elsewhere. This

broke references

to /posix files from demo/Makefile.in so that the configure

generated demo

makefile does not work - it stumbles over refences to the files

which were

in posix. A cursory substitution of /src for /posix in demo/Makefile.in
revealed that not everything had been moved from posix into src; I can
ferret around with it tomorrow if someone hasn't already fixed

it - it would

be nice to have working examples.

Let me know if that is too simple minded and if more major changes are
required to get the demos going.

regards

~m


_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp


_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp



_______________________________________________
Bug-commoncpp mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]