Re: problems with 1.9.7 and libxml2-2.4.19

[Mike Castle]

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:33:24PM -0400, David Sugar wrote:
> I suspect commoncpp2 will have the same issue.  Is there a simple #if 
> test we can do to use alternate #includes for the newer releases?

The newer style will work for both.

address@hidden:34pm]src/libxml2/libxml2-2.4.19(636) sh xml2-config --cflags
-I/usr/include/libxml2
address@hidden:34pm]src/libxml2/libxml2-2.4.19(637) cd ../*17
address@hidden:34pm]src/libxml2/libxml2-2.4.17(638) sh xml2-config --cflags
-I/usr/include/libxml2/libxml -I/usr/include/libxml2
address@hidden:34pm]src/libxml2/libxml2-2.4.17(639) cd ../*12
address@hidden:34pm]src/libxml2/libxml2-2.4.12(640) sh xml2-config --cflags
-I/usr/include/libxml2/libxml -I/usr/include/libxml2

So, at least back to 2.4.12, #include<libxml/xxx.h> will work.

mrc
-- 
     Mike Castle      address@hidden      www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan.  -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc