Re: Incremental XML Parsing

[Federico Montesino Pouzols]

        Yes, I think this patch should go on both the stable and
unstable branches. It adds a very interesting capability and should
not harm applications that do not need partial parsing.

        It is also interesting to discuss the following two points:

        * The patch from Ari implements the "Method 1" he described in
his first mail. Should we also add a special parse() -say
partialParse()- method that implements the "Method 2"? I suppose this
method would be almost equal to the normal parse(), except that it
would run just one iteration of the loop.

        * What do we do with the read() and close() virtual methods
now?  Should we remove them, or would it be valid to call read()
inside the loop and close() after the loop? I think this last option
makes sense but I am not too certain.

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:39:14PM -0400, David Sugar wrote:
> We may want to have this in the RELEASE1 tree as well...?  It seems harmless 
> enough for existing code.
> 
> On Wednesday 09 October 2002 13:04, Ari Johnson wrote:
> > I did go ahead and implement this; took about 3 minutes total.  My patch
> > to xml.cpp is attached to this message.
> >  -- Ari Johnson
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp