Re: Autoconf check for XML support?

[David Sugar]

I thought the incremental XML parsing patch had made it into the current
distributions.  Let me review that.  The cc++/config.h file provides
compile time info on if xml support was built.  Perhaps you can create a
simple macro which examines it.  I think having a OST_CCXX2_XML check 
might be a useful addition to ost_check2.m4.

On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Ari Johnson wrote:

> 
> I see that there is an OST_CCXX2_DYNLOADER check among the autoconf macros
> defined by ost_check2.m4, but no such way to determine if XML support is
> built in.  I'm at the point in my project where I need to make the
> decision to move to a more portable autoconf/automake build environment,
> and that means that I'll need my configure script to check for an
> appropriate version of CommonC++ as well as for built-in XML support.
> As to incremental XML parsing, I'll just have to assume that people use
> the CVS version until an incremented release number exists for the next
> release, when I do OST_CCXX2_VERSION.
> 
> Would it overclutter things to include an OST_CCXX2_XML check, or is there
> perhaps a better way to accomplish this?  Thanks.
> 
> Ari Johnson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp
>