Re: Rearranging source files

[David Sugar]

While it sounds like the right thing to do, this sounds like it should be 
introduced in an active release after 1.1, perhaps for "1.2".  1.1 still has 
fairly limited changes that don't break most peoples existing projects, while 
this could...

On Thursday 01 January 2004 08:08 pm, Marc Boris Dürner wrote:
> I have started (almost done actually) to separate the networking code from
> the base
> library to form a library called ccNet. Normally one class per .h/.cpp
> pair, except for
> exception classes or the validator classes.
>
> Is there anything else we can modularise?
>
> I wasnt sure what the extension library is, but it seemed pretty generic to
> me. I have put
> these classes in the base lib for now.
>
> Any thought on a naming scheme? ccNet seemed like the logical choice
> (ccAudio,
> ccScript... already exist). How shall we call the base lib? libccBase? or
> just libcc?
>
> How about the namespace Gnu::? after all this is an official gnu project,
> isnt it?
>
>
> Marc
>
> On Saturday 27 December 2003 17:06, you wrote:
> > It could make it easier to find things, but some classes were so trivial.
> >
> > Generally, source files are split by hiearchies of related classes and by
> >
> > library (ccgnu, ccext), although in many cases a source file do cover a
> > single class and other cases a grouping of closely related classes.
> >
> > "Marc Boris Dürner" said:
> > > Hi,
> > > Just wondering if the source files could be split so that there is one
> > > class
> > > per file?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Marc