Re: "gaurd" typo

[David Sugar]

I actually almost hate these kind of errors, because they nonetheless do
touch upon linkage abi.   Actually it is probably a good time to
consider what will become 6.0, which offers a good opportunity to also
consider depreciating/changing/break other abi issues.  I have thought
about re-organizing the string class a bit to make it simpler to use in
expressions, for example.

On 04/04/2012 01:59 PM, Tristan Matthews wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed in corelib/thread.cpp and inc/ucommon/thread.h that Mutex::gaurd is 
> probably meant to be spelled Mutex::guard. 
> I've attached a trivial patch which fixes this typo.
> 
> Best,
> Tristan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp