RE: Installing in FHS locations

[Wichmann, Mats D]

>> In the fileutils-shutils-textutils setup, I ended up only having to
>> move 'cat' to comply with the FHS.

>That seems odd.  By my count there are at least 26 programs that need
>to be moved into /bin and 61 that are left in /usr/bin.  At the very
>least to follow FHS you need these in /bin.

>  cat chgrp chmod chown cp date dd df dir echo false ln ls mkdir mknod
>  mv pwd rm rmdir sleep stty sync touch true uname vdir

Yeah, I forgot that there was a move in the sh-utils
build file, so I'm actually moving an even dozen.
Memory cells must really be going :-(
The rest come from pointing the fileutils install
at /bin, which I cannot do now that it's one big pkg.


Anyway, thanks for the explanation on how this works.
Now I guess we need to think of a way around it. We don't
do any post-build packaging, the project in question is 
derived from the Linux From Scratch scheme, which builds
from the tarballs and simply produces a directory tree; 
I guess you could characterize it as the packaging at
the source, rather than binary level.