[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: language of coreutils
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: language of coreutils |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:20:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Almost all of the existing 89 programs are written in C,
> > and none are written in C++, so C would be best.
> > But if you make a good case for using C++, I'll consider it.
>
> The GNU coding standards argue for C and against C++; see
> <http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_7.html#SEC7>. I'd think that any
> case for using C++ would have to overcome those objections, too.
Lately I have been fighting C++ STL problems. While it is possible to
write fully portable C++ programs it seems that most people don't
complish that goal. C has been a better performer in the portable
area.
> > I would also consider scripts written in Perl.
>
> or Python or Guile? :-)
Or Ruby?
Bob