[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:38:09 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
ari wrote:
> I notice that the 'head' and 'tail' commands, in the latest version of
> coreutils, were modified to do away with the following options:
>
> -<number> (head, tail)
> +<number> (tail)
This has just recently been discussed. Please read the archive for
details of this discussion.
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2003-09/msg00082.html
Bob
- "conformance" vs. compatibility, ari, 2003/11/02
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility,
Bob Proulx <=
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, ari, 2003/11/02
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, ari, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Paul Jarc, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Jim Meyering, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Paul Jarc, 2003/11/03
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, ari, 2003/11/04
- Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2003/11/04
Re: "conformance" vs. compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2003/11/03