[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct
From: |
Andy Isaacson |
Subject: |
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:09:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 05:02:24PM -0500, Nathan Straz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 05:03:58PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > Linux-kernel: is this patch horribly wrong?
> ...
> > to force O_DIRECT. The enclosed patch adds a "conv=direct" flag to
> > enable this usage.
>
> Adding the functionality to conv= doesn't seem right to me. conv= is
> for converting the data in some way. This is just changing the way data
> is written. Right?
There's already conv=notrunc which means "open without O_TRUNC". I
agree that it's a nonintuitive interface, but then, the entire dd(1)
command line is.
> Have you looked at lmdd? It supports O_DIRECT and many other things not
> in the standard dd.
Wasn't aware of that one. Thanks for the pointer.
-andy
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/13
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Jim Meyering, 2004/04/14
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/15
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Bryce, 2004/04/15
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/07
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Andrew Morton, 2004/04/08
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Andy Isaacson, 2004/04/08
Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Nathan Straz, 2004/04/08
- Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct,
Andy Isaacson <=
Re: Re: dd PATCH: add conv=direct, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/08