Re: df patch: show inode usage and block usage at once

[Jos Backus]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:43:46PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> A couple of dumb questions.  What does BSD's df -i output look like?
> And would it make sense simply to modify coreutils to match BSD's
> behavior, particularly if the BSD behavior is more useful?
 
Fyi: on FreeBSD -current:

lizzy:~% uname -a
FreeBSD lizzy.catnook.local 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #7: Tue Jun 21
00:41:15 PDT 2005     address@hidden:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIZZY
i386
lizzy:~% df -i 
Filesystem  1K-blocks    Used    Avail Capacity iused   ifree %iused  Mounted
on
/dev/da2s2a    253678  100876   132508    43%    2899   30123    9%   /
devfs               1       1        0   100%       0       0  100%   /dev
/dev/da2s2d    253678   93054   140330    40%    3283   29739   10%   /var
/dev/da2s2f   6824094 2800544  3477624    45%  161158  733816   18%   /usr
/dev/md0        63214    2638    55520     5%     316    8130    4%   /tmp
/dev/da1s1d  34710178 6225418 25707946    19%  166408 4332022    4%   /home
/dev/da0s3d   6560308 5249434   786050    87%   76128  795294    9%
/home.bak
procfs              4       4        0   100%       1       0  100%   /proc
linprocfs           4       4        0   100%       1       0  100%
/usr/compat/linux/proc
fdescfs             1       1        0   100%       4    9162    0%   /dev/fd
lizzy:~% 

> (I presume that coreutils is mimicking BSD's old behavior here, and
> BSD changed.)

-- 
Jos Backus
jos at catnook.com