[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug in uname command
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug in uname command |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:05:44 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
> As I understand it, that is a deficiency in the Linux API rather than
> a bug in coreutils proper: Linux doesn't support the relevant sysinfo
> (Solaris-style) or sysctl (BSD-style) system calls. Perhaps you can
> report the problem to the Linux kernel folks.
What about parsing /proc/cpuinfo, on machines that have that? (Cygwin
falls into the same camp as linux, where this information is in
/proc/cpuinfo, but not available from any easy system call.)
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDJ5OH84KuGfSFAYARApHEAJ9rYI3q3EF8bVO/G5W7mDDvRrVUSwCfYUBL
xTX4M5DVIUxlQbTNz+tfqf8=
=18S5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Possible bug in uname command, Asif Iqbal, Trumboo, 2005/09/13
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/13
- Re: Possible bug in uname command,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Bob Proulx, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Bob Proulx, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Bob Proulx, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/09/14
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Bob Proulx, 2005/09/15
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/09/15
- Re: Possible bug in uname command, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/15