|
From: | Bob Proulx |
Subject: | Re: design question, why not always use 'cp --remove-destination'? |
Date: | Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:13:02 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Frederik Eaton writes: > The question is, is there a reason why users wouldn't always want a > "copyFile" function to remove the destination first? It effectively resets all ACLs on the destination. Bob
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |