Re: better nohup documentation for I/O redirection

[Jim Meyering]

Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Like Jim, I'm not sold about adding an option to nohup when simple I/O
> redirection already works.  However, I think it'd be nice to document
> the I/O redirection.  Here's a proposed patch.
>
> [ChangeLog]
> * src/nohup.c (usage): Describe how standard input and output
> are redirected.
> [doc/ChangeLog]
> * coreutils.texi (nohup invocation): Add advice about saving
> output to a file.

Thanks.  I applied those changes.