[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rm performance issue
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Rm performance issue |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:54:58 +0200 |
"Ken Naim" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> 1.ext3
> 2. Yes we are using an LVM
Now that we've established this isn't a problem with rm,
you might want to ask around on ext3- or LVM-specific lists.
You might even want to consider using a different type of
file system. xfs is supposed to be particularly well-suited
to usage patterns involving very large files.
Also, your kernel is rather old. Upgrading would probably pull
in much newer ext3 support.
> 3. Yes, we aren't seeing any hardware issues.
>
> I am about to perform an strace of the process and will update you on the
> progress.
Please Cc the mailing list with any reply, i.e., use "Reply-All".
Replying to an individual (and dropping the list Cc:) like you have
done two or three times is frowned upon in some circles.
- Rm performance issue, Ken Naim, 2007/09/26
- Re: Rm performance issue, Jim Meyering, 2007/09/26
- Message not available
- Re: Rm performance issue,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: Rm performance issue, Philip Rowlands, 2007/09/26
- Message not available
- RE: Rm performance issue, Philip Rowlands, 2007/09/26
- Re: Rm performance issue, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/26
- RE: Rm performance issue, Ken Naim, 2007/09/26
- Re: Rm performance issue, Bauke Jan Douma, 2007/09/26
- Re: Rm performance issue, James Youngman, 2007/09/26