[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: redundancy in description of 'cp -a'
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: redundancy in description of 'cp -a' |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:15:40 +0100 |
Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> Since option -d of 'cp' includes the function of -P, mentioning the
> latter in the description of option -a is redundant and therefore
> slightly confusing, as the reader tries to figure out what it adds.
>
> - -a, --archive same as -dpPR\n\
> + -a, --archive same as -dpR\n\
Thank you! Applied and pushed.
> (To save the reader the looking up of -d, -p and -R, it might be
> useful to add after -dpR that this means --no-dereference
> --preserve=links,mode,ownership,timestamps --resursive. However,
> that might give a wrong idea about the meaning of -p.)
I agree.
And I prefer not to duplicate things, so I'll leave this as-is.