|
From: | Jim Meyering |
Subject: | Re: [bug #21999] rm fails completely on systems that don't have dirfd() |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:07:40 +0100 |
Alan Hourihane <address@hidden> wrote: > And therefore dirfd() is implemented with returning DIR_TO_FD(Dir_p) -1. Thanks. We need to know why it ends up using that value. Please post your config.log file and tell us what type of system you're using.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |