[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fuse-discuss] rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem
From: |
Mark Phalan |
Subject: |
Re: [fuse-discuss] rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:18:49 -0600 |
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 16:25 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
...
>
> ntfs-3g correctly returns ENOTEMPTY but this information gets lost and
> arrives as success to gnu rm.
>
> This indeed looks to be a problem in Solaris.
Yup, I agree. Solaris rm(1) has the correct behaviour but using the GNU
rm causes strangeness. Here's what happens with sshfs:
$ mkdir -p l/l/l/l/l/l/l/l
$ /usr/gnu/bin/rm -fr l
/usr/gnu/bin/rm: cannot remove directory `l': Not owner
$ /usr/bin/rm -fr l
$
I've opened a bug to track this on defect.opensolaris.org:
2930 GNU rm causes problems for FUSE
Feel free to add comments/update it.
-M
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, (continued)
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/13
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Andras Barna, 2008/08/13
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Andras Barna, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Szabolcs Szakacsits, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Szabolcs Szakacsits, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Andras Barna, 2008/08/14
- Re: rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem, Szabolcs Szakacsits, 2008/08/14
- Re: [fuse-discuss] rm && opensolaris && ntfs-3g problem,
Mark Phalan <=