[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in date (coreutils-6.12)
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: bug in date (coreutils-6.12) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 23:03:20 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
David Chin wrote:
> Eli Rykoff <address@hidden> told me about this, and I verified with
> coreutils-6.12 compiled with gcc-4.3.0 on Fedora Core 9.
> coreutils-6.10 which comes with Fedora Core 9 also has this bug.
Thank you for your report. However I do not see any bug here.
> To reproduce, do this:
> date -d "2006-04-02 02:30:00"
You didn't say but I assume you are seeing this following output and
are confused by it? This is the expected output in a US timezone.
date: invalid date `2006-04-02 02:30:00'
First, you didn't specify a timezone. My timezone is US/Mountain and
that is an invalid date in my timezone. Let me assume that you are
using a US timezone. If you check your calender you will find that
daylight savings changed on that date and there wasn't a 2:30 on that
day. Because Using zdump to output the timezone data is helpful here.
$ zdump -v US/Mountain | grep 2006
US/Mountain Sun Apr 2 08:59:59 2006 UTC = Sun Apr 2 01:59:59 2006 MST
isdst=0 gmtoff=-25200
US/Mountain Sun Apr 2 09:00:00 2006 UTC = Sun Apr 2 03:00:00 2006 MDT
isdst=1 gmtoff=-21600
US/Mountain Sun Oct 29 07:59:59 2006 UTC = Sun Oct 29 01:59:59 2006 MDT
isdst=1 gmtoff=-21600
US/Mountain Sun Oct 29 08:00:00 2006 UTC = Sun Oct 29 01:00:00 2006 MST
isdst=0 gmtoff=-25200
This shows that on my system MDT begins on Apr 2 03:00:00 2006 MDT
with the last second before being Apr 2 01:59:59 2006 MST and
therefore "2006-04-02 02:30:00" cannot be a valid time in the US. It
may be a valid time elsewhere in another timezone. (I should have
asked how such a date string was generated in the first place given
that it is an invalid string.)
Of course there is no trouble at all in the UTC timezone.
$ date -u -d "2006-04-02 02:30:00 UTC"
Sun Apr 2 02:30:00 UTC 2006
> As a comparison, do this:
> date -d "2006-04-01 02:30:00"
Sure. That was the day before and that day *did* have a 2:30am MST.
And the day after would be okay too.
Now you know why UTC has so much going for it and why I am not a fan
of DST. :-)
And a fun time was had by all with time, dates and calendars. :-)
Hope that helps,
Bob