[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:46:33 -0600 |
It's probably useful to add this functionality to all coreutil filters.
Wouldn't it suffice to add buffer control options to cat, rather than
every program?
I still need to be convinced that glibc is not the correct place for
this. If it was there then any users of stdio could be controlled.
Maybe so, but the chances of any such change actually getting into glibc
seem rather small in practice to me. Maybe a gnulib module, if someone
is volunteering to write the code :).
karl
- Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, David Corlette, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/20
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Reuben Thomas, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
- Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/22