bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] dd: work around buffer length restrictions with oflag=direct


From: Eric Sandeen
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dd: work around buffer length restrictions with oflag=direct (O_DIRECT)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:41:03 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)

Jim Meyering wrote:
> Eric Sandeen mentioned that dd's O_DIRECT-exposing code
> didn't always work.  The problem is that the kernel imposes
> draconian restrictions on the size of buffer that one may
> write to an FD opened with O_DIRECT.  Currently, at least on
> ext4 and with a recent linux kernel, that buffer size must
> be a multiple of 512, which happens to be dd's default buffer size.

(there are alignment restrictions too, just FWIW)

...

> Note also that the code makes no attempt to determine the
> appropriate block size.  So if you chose obs=42, you lose.
> The adventurous user who experiments with oflags=direct
> must also select a block size that works with O_DIRECT
> and the destination file system.

I think that's fine, docs can say "subject to size and alignment
requirements of the kernel and filesystem" or something I think.

> Here's the patch I expect to push soon:
> 
> From 2f4004be6131e049a1452ee68377ae1756673bd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:54:58 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] dd: work around buffer length restrictions with oflag=direct 
> (O_DIRECT)
> 
> * src/dd.c (iwrite): Turn off O_DIRECT for any
> smaller-than-obs-sized write.  Don't bother to restore it.
> * tests/dd/direct: New test for the above.
> * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Add od/direct.
> * doc/coreutils.texi (dd invocation): Mention oflags=direct
> buffer size restriction.
> Reported by Eric Sandeen.
> ---
>  doc/coreutils.texi |    4 ++++
>  src/dd.c           |   10 +++++++++-
>  tests/Makefile.am  |    1 +
>  tests/dd/direct    |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100755 tests/dd/direct
> 
> diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi
> index acec76e..6fa2602 100644
> --- a/doc/coreutils.texi
> +++ b/doc/coreutils.texi
> @@ -7861,6 +7861,10 @@ dd invocation
>  @opindex direct
>  @cindex direct I/O
>  Use direct I/O for data, avoiding the buffer cache.
> +Note that the kernel may impose restrictions on read or write buffer sizes.
> +For example, with an ext4 destination file system and a linux-based kernel,
> +using @samp{oflags=direct} will cause writes to fail with @code{EINVAL} if 
> the
> +output buffer size is not a multiple of 512.

I dunno how much O_DIRECT tutorial you want here but alignment matters
too :)

>  @item directory
>  @opindex directory
> diff --git a/src/dd.c b/src/dd.c
> index 9a9d22a..43ad718 100644
> --- a/src/dd.c
> +++ b/src/dd.c
> @@ -837,6 +837,14 @@ iwrite (int fd, char const *buf, size_t size)
>  {
>    size_t total_written = 0;
> 
> +  if ((output_flags & O_DIRECT) && size < output_blocksize)
> +    {
> +      int old_flags = fcntl (STDOUT_FILENO, F_GETFL);
> +      if (fcntl (STDOUT_FILENO, F_SETFL, old_flags & ~O_DIRECT) != 0)
> +        error (0, errno, _("failed to turn off O_DIRECT: %s"),
> +               quote (output_file));
> +    }
> +
>    while (total_written < size)
>      {
>        ssize_t nwritten;

I suppose it would be nice to at least make that last buffered IO
synchronous if possible, or sync the file afterwards.
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED for extra credit?  :)

Thanks,
-Eric




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]