[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:42 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:
>
> AFAIK, I am the only one who has built the latest snapshot:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.bugs/17604
>
> Though it's been only two days.
>
> Unless I hear of new bug reports or portability problems soon,
> expect coreutils-7.5 to be released in the next few days.
On cygwin, 'make' completes, but 'make check' issues a warning (and fails if I
also add -Werror to CFLAGS):
ccache gcc -std=gnu99 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -Wl,--as-needed -o stdbuf.exe
stdbuf.o libver.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a /usr/local/lib/libintl.dll.a -liconv -
L/usr/local/lib ../lib/libcoreutils.a -liconv
diff progs-makefile progs-readme && rm -rf progs-readme progs-makefile
ccache gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../lib -I../lib -I/usr/local/include -fPIC -
gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -MT libstdbuf_so-libstdbuf.o -MD -MP -
MF .deps/libstdbuf_so-libstdbuf.Tpo -c -o libstdbuf_so-libstdbuf.o `test -
f 'libstdbuf.c' || echo './'`libstdbuf.c
libstdbuf.c:1: warning: -fPIC ignored for target (all code is position
independent)
And even if I don't turn on -Werror, 'make check' dies further on:
CCLD libstdbuf.so.exe
libstdbuf_so-libstdbuf.o: In function `apply_mode':
/home/eblake/coreutils/src/libstdbuf.c:108: undefined reference to
`_libintl_gettext'
/home/eblake/coreutils/src/libstdbuf.c:116: undefined reference to
`_libintl_gettext'
/home/eblake/coreutils/src/libstdbuf.c:124: undefined reference to
`_libintl_gettext'
(wow - it really seems like this should be creating libstdbuf.dll or even
cygstdbuf.dll, per cygwin naming conventions; not libstdbuf.so.exe).
I'm not sure whether libstdbuf will even work for cygwin (as it is not ELF);
and part of me is afraid that we would have to use libtool to get this to work
portably. Maybe it is easiest to just figure out how to disable stdbuf from
even being attempted, let along tested, on cygwin, until I can find more time
to investigate it further?
I'm now running 'make -k check', and will try to spot any obvious problems. I
already have some effort for porting things like freopen O_BINARY issues over
to cygwin that I have not yet pushed upstream. But I maintain my stance that,
as in the past, I don't want you to feel obligated to hold up the release
process just to cater to cygwin.
--
Eric Blake
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, (continued)
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, C de-Avillez, 2009/08/12
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, C de-Avillez, 2009/08/12
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Pádraig Brady, 2009/08/13
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/13
Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Pádraig Brady, 2009/08/13
Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/14
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Eric Blake, 2009/08/14
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/14
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Eric Blake, 2009/08/14
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Jim Meyering, 2009/08/14
- Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon, Eric Blake, 2009/08/14