[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] new open flag O_NOSTD
|
From: |
James Youngman |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] new open flag O_NOSTD |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:12:42 +0100 |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Eric Blake<address@hidden> wrote:
> The name proposed in this mail is O_NOSTD (implying that a successful
> result will not be any of the standard file descriptors); other ideas
> mentioned on the bug-gnulib list were O_SAFER, O_NONSTD, O_NOSTDFD.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2009-08/msg00358.html
>
> Thoughts?
Mostly yes, I like it.
I'd like to explicitly vote against O_SAFER, because there may be (for
some systems or in the future) some other way of making open(2) safer.
I'd vote positively for O_NOSTDFD or O_NOSTD.
James.
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Florian Weimer, 2009/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Eric Blake, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Florian Weimer, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Eric Blake, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Eric Blake, 2009/08/28
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Davide Libenzi, 2009/08/27
- Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD, Ulrich Drepper, 2009/08/27
Re: [RFC] new open flag O_NOSTD,
James Youngman <=