[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
split behavior
From: |
Roger McNichols |
Subject: |
split behavior |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:51:36 -0500 (CDT) |
Currently using version 5.2.1 of coreutils 'split' command produces files
with 'intelligent' suffixes. That is, the number of letters (or digits)
required
is based on the known number of output files that will be required.
An OLD version of split (and I dont know which one becuase I dont have it
anymore)
used 'dumb' suffixes. That is, it would start with aa, ab, ac, ..., ba, bb,
bc, ...
util it got to zz and then would jump to zzaa, zzab, zzac, ... etc and then on
to zzaaaa, zzaaab, zzaaac, etc...
While the OLD version may have been annoying, the behavior had two distinct
advantages:
FIRST, corresponding sections of files, regardless of the overall file size,
would have
the same suffixes.
SECOND, the OLD version of split was capable of reading an arbitrary
stream of input from the stdin, where as the NEW version complains when it gets
to zz that
output suffixes are exhausted (and fails).
A final problem is that there does not appear to be a way to get the NEW
version to
behave like the OLD version. So an application created years ago with the OLD
version which
used the suffixes as a reference for corresponding data tags can no longer be
augmented
without rebuilding the entire related database.
It would be HIGHLY convenient if split could be made to operate in the OLD
non-presumptive
manner for creating suffixes, at least for the "split -N - prefix." stdin
invocation.
I can provide more detail if it is helpful. I hope that I have made the
difficulty clear
enough. Thanks for considering.
-roger
___________________________
Roger J. McNichols, Ph.D.
Chief Scientist
BioTex, Inc.
8058 El Rio St.
Houston, TX 77054
713.741.0111 (o)
713.741.0122 (f)
832.338.4371 (m)
- split behavior,
Roger McNichols <=
- Re: split behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/09/11
- Re: split behavior, Pádraig Brady, 2009/09/12
- Re: split behavior, Roger McNichols, 2009/09/13
- Re: split behavior, Pádraig Brady, 2009/09/14
- Re: split behavior, Roger McNichols, 2009/09/14
- Re: split behavior, Pádraig Brady, 2009/09/14
- Re: split behavior, Pádraig Brady, 2009/09/14
Re: split behavior, Pádraig Brady, 2009/09/11