[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pinky command
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Pinky command |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:10:37 -0500 |
> Why the name of command was changed from "finger" to "pinky"? I
> liked new name, but there may be Some old scripts (copied from
> Unix to Linux) in which finger may have used. I suggested finger
> as a link to pinky.
As far as I know pinky is not a replacement for finger but is instead
a lightweight version of it. On my Debian system I have both a
'finger' command and a 'pinky' command and the output is not identical
between them. Although they are very similar.
Pink just reads utmp, while finger connects either to a local deamon
or a remote one and does a similar task (pinky will not show when you
mail spool was updated for example). The difference (in short) is
that pink is a local command, and finger is a remote one. Both do a
similar task, but very the implementation is very different, finger
works over TCP/IP and can probe a remote host about a user, while pink
does not.
Most software distributions that include finger include one of the
free versions such as the BSD netkit one. Here is one such:
I really need to take time to implement finger for inetutils, so GNU
and its variants do not need to use netkig! :-)