bug-coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A file cloned with "cp --reflink" different from the original one?


From: Pádraig Brady
Subject: Re: A file cloned with "cp --reflink" different from the original one?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:47:22 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008)

Jian Lin wrote:
> 2009/11/23 Pádraig Brady <address@hidden>:
>> Jian Lin wrote:
>>> I installed BtrFS 0.19 and GNU coreutils 8.1 on my Ubuntu 9.10.
>>> I tried to clone some files with "cp --reflink" to make them 
>>> "copy-on-write".
>>> However, I found some of the files cloned have different MD5s to the
>>> original one.
>>>
>>> Is BtrFS (or cp with reflink) buggy?
>>> Or it is indeed a feature that I used incorrectly?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt# uname -a
>>> Linux lj-laptop 2.6.31-15-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 10 14:54:29
>>> UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt# mount | grep btrfs
>>> /dev/sda4 on /mnt type btrfs (rw)
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt# cp --version
>>> cp (GNU coreutils) 8.1
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt# cd WinXP_CHS/
>>> address@hidden:/mnt/WinXP_CHS# cp WinXP_CHS.vmdk WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk 
>>> --reflink
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt/WinXP_CHS# ls -la WinXP_CHS.vmdk WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1713766400 Nov 23 15:11 WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1713766400 Nov 23 13:32 WinXP_CHS.vmdk
>>>
>>> address@hidden:/mnt/WinXP_CHS# md5sum WinXP_CHS.vmdk WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk
>>> f6da592d056167a44b089d70fa46f863  WinXP_CHS.vmdk
>>> e3ee0c2c17771811c80eed088c20987d  WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk
>> Yikes. Are you 100% sure nothing is changing those vm files?
> 
> I think so. I run md5sum immediately after cloning the file.
> 
>> Note I wouldn't 100% trust the mtime, so an md5sum before
>> and after would be good to confirm.
>>
>> You could try this simple prog to do the clones to
>> implicate coreutils or otherwise:
>>
>> #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #define BTRFS_IOC_CLONE 1074041865
>>
>> int main(int argc, const char **argv)
>> {
>>  int in = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
>>  int out = open(argv[2], O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_WRONLY, 0644);
>>  if (ioctl(out, BTRFS_IOC_CLONE, in)==-1) {
>>      fprintf(stderr, "ioctl error = %m\n");
>>  }
>>  close(in);
>>  close(out);
>>  return 0;
>> }
> 
> I compiled and tried this program.
> ./clone WinXP_CHS.vmdk WinXP_CHS-clone.vmdk
> then I got md5 of WinXP_CHS-clone.vmdk, which is the same as that of
> WinXP_CHS-ref.vmdk (made by cp --reflink), and different from the md5
> of original WinXP_CHS.vmdk.
> 
> The cloned vm cannot run correctly, which said "hal.dll lost". The
> cloned Linux vm I mentioned before also reported "/bin/bash lost".
> Another tiny linux vm I cloned with the same md5 to its original vmdk
> can run correctly.

OK then it sounds like an issue with BTRFS (CC'd)
(which could already be fixed since it's in active development).

cheers,
Pádraig.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]