[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option
From: |
Chen Guo |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:04:35 -0800 (PST) |
Hi all,
I'm about to implement everything we discussed. One thing I want to double
check is, since we have --number-lines=x/y and --number-bytes=x/y as the long
options, obviously we can't just use -n for the short option.
So would it be acceptable to do -nb=x/y and -nl=x/y? This seems the most
intuitive to me, but I can see where this would cause confusion with the -b and
-l options. What do you guys think?
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option,
Chen Guo <=
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Chen Guo, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Chen Guo, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Chen Guo, 2009/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] split: --chunks option, Chen Guo, 2009/12/20