bug#7213: [PATCH] sort: fix buffer overrun on 32-bit hosts when warning re obsolete keys

[Paul Eggert]

On 10/14/10 03:27, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> So the test failed due to buffer overrun side effects?

I think so, yes, though I didn't investigate the details.

On 10/14/10 02:37, Jim Meyering wrote:
> With the following patch, compilation now fails on x86-based systems:
> 
> sort.c: In function 'key_warnings':
> sort.c:2335: error: negative width in bit-field 
> 'verify_error_if_negative_size__'
> sort.c:2335: error: negative width in bit-field 
> 'verify_error_if_negative_size__'
...

I assume this is against the unpatched sort.c.  It's nice that
it generates a diagnostic, but why is it generating duplicate
diagnostics for each error?

> BTW, for fyi-style patches like this,
> please use address@hidden rather than bug-...

Sorry about posting to bug-coreutils; I forgot that I was
supposed to send it to coreutils.  But even if I had remembered,
I thought I was supposed to send patches to coreutils only if I
had applied them, under the theory that the bug had already been
fixed.  So the real rule is: send patches to coreutils, and
bug reports without patches to bug-coreutils?