[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9089: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000205]: Shell pipeline connection requ
From: |
Jonathan Nieder |
Subject: |
bug#9089: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000205]: Shell pipeline connection requirement too vague |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:38:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
Eric Blake wrote:
> According to David Korn on 1/7/2010 1:46 PM:
>> The simplest change to the standard would be to require that recv()
>> work on pipes as well as sockets.
>
> Is this something we should pursue further, to get to a point where pipe()
> is not so bad to use?
Does any Unix-like platform aside from Linux lack that feature? Is
there any architectural consideration that would make MSG_PEEK
difficult to implement for Linux's pipes? (For the former, I have no
clue, while for the latter, I suspect not.)
If not, I suppose we should take this to LKML. Thanks; this sounds
like it would be a nice feature.
Regards,
Jonathan