[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:11:11 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 12/26/2011 10:25 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 02:20, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>> chcon, chgrp need the same adjustment.
>> Note I'd prefer to keep -R and -v together
>> as they're more general than --ref and
>> can use the same translations.
>
> If we're going to list options in some order
> than alphabetically (which often makes sense),
> shouldn't -c, -f, and -v be kept together?
> This would be for the same reason that --no-preserve-root
> and --preserve-root are kept together: they're related
> options.
Agreed. I'll adjust like:
-c, -f, -v
--{no-,}preserve-root
--recursive
--reference
--$command_specific
--help
--version
cheers,
Pádraig.
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Jari Aalto, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically, Paul Eggert, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] chmod.c usage() order items alphabetically,
Pádraig Brady <=
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Jim Meyering, 2011/12/26
- bug#10369: coreutils: [PATCH] doc: homologize ch{con, grp, mod, own} option descriptions, Pádraig Brady, 2011/12/26