[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10735: chmod +x
From: |
francky . leyn |
Subject: |
bug#10735: chmod +x |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:49:26 +0100 (CET) |
Dear Bob,
is there any way I could suppress the warning given by chmod +x?
Best regards,
FRancky
----- Oorspronkelijk e-mail -----
> address@hidden wrote:
> > some more questions.
> > I abstract a file system as something where each dir/file has a
> > header
> > where all properties reside.
>
> Yes. This information is stored in the Inode. You can read about it
> here.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inode
>
> > There doesn't exist a hybrid file system that unites eg. NTFS and
> > ext4?
>
> No. Not as far as I know.
>
> > NTFS is not POSIX complient?
>
> No. At least as far as I know. Others will know. I don't use NTFS.
> In any case it would need to support Unix filesystem permissions
> along
> with user and group ownership and the full set of behavior.
>
> Until recently it was only possible to reliably read from NTFS
> because
> the necessary information for it wasn't reverse engineered yet.
> Recently this has been completed and it is now possible to write to
> NTFS. Given how it came about it is amazing that it works at all.
>
> Bob
>
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Bob Proulx, 2012/02/06
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Bob Proulx, 2012/02/06
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Alan Curry, 2012/02/06
- bug#10735: chmod +x,
francky . leyn <=
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/07
- bug#10735: chmod +x, francky . leyn, 2012/02/07
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/07
- bug#10735: chmod +x, Eric Blake, 2012/02/07
- bug#10735: chmod +x, francky . leyn, 2012/02/10